<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>'Death of a President' Wins an Emmy</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/25/death-of-a-president-wins-an-emmy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/25/death-of-a-president-wins-an-emmy/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/25/death-of-a-president-wins-an-emmy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/08/deathofapresident.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Hey, remember that film that received <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/">so much hype</a> and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/31/death-of-a-president-in-the-u-s/">controversy</a> only to be released with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/">a whimper</a> and a lot of <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_of_a_president/">negative reviews</a>? I'm talking about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/"><em>Death of a President</em></a>, a non-comedic mockumentary focused on the (fictional) assassination of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0124133/">George W. Bush</a>. I thought it was a terrible movie, and not because I thought it was tasteless. I actually thought the idea was interesting; I just didn't think it was executed well in the style in which it was done. But plenty of others, including my friends and colleagues, liked the darn thing. It even played for a few months (mostly on Saturday nights) at the Pioneer Theater here in New York. Most astonishing, though, is the fact that it <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article2910591.ece">won an Emmy Award</a> the other night. Actually, it was an International Emmy, for Best TV Movie/Mini-Series. <br /><br />I didn't even know the International Emmys existed until the other night. I was walking down a Manhattan street and saw all these people in tuxedos walking up the red carpet to the ceremony. I didn't recognize anyone, but now, for all I know, one of the monkey-suited gents I walked past was <em>DOAP </em>filmmaker <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1235949/">Gabriel Range</a>. Not that I would have told him I disliked his movie -- once he had the statue in hand he wouldn't have cared what I thought anyway. Still, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000134/">Robert DeNiro</a> was apparently at the event, presenting a special award to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0330722/">Al Gore</a>. Others who not only attended but also won include British actor <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000980/">Jim Broadbent</a>, Dutch actor <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0092592/">Pierre Bokma</a>, French actress <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0732222/">Muriel Robin</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000410/">Stephen Fry</a>, who features in the Best Documentary-winner <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808482/"><em>Stephen Fry: The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive</em></a>.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article2910591.ece>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/25/death-of-a-president-wins-an-emmy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1045768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/25/death-of-a-president-wins-an-emmy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>al gore</category><category>AlGore</category><category>cinematical</category><category>death of a president</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><category>film</category><category>gabriel range</category><category>GabrielRange</category><category>george w. bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>jim broadbent</category><category>JimBroadbent</category><category>movie</category><category>muriel robin</category><category>MurielRobin</category><category>pierre bokma</category><category>PierreBokma</category><category>president bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>robert deniro</category><category>RobertDeniro</category><category>stephen fry</category><category>StephenFry</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Seven: Movies That Surprised Me With Their Bad Special Effects</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/20th-century-fox/" rel="tag">20th Century Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/peter-jackson/" rel="tag">Peter Jackson</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cinematical-seven/" rel="tag">Cinematical Seven</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lists/" rel="tag">Lists</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/07/kingkongdinos.jpg" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>In this day and age you can do anything with special effects. But can you do it well? I believe that you can, but Hollywood doesn't seem to be in agreement with my belief. Studios continue to put out movies with special effects that disappoint, and I think it is disrespectful to audiences. Either figure it out, or leave it out. Every time I see a bad effect in a movie, I know it could have been done better, or more imaginatively, and it frustrates the heck out of me. The worst is when I see a bad effect in a movie with mostly great effects, such as in <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0167260/">The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King</a></em>. </p>
<p>A visual effect doesn't have to be great or even realistic as long as it works with the story and is believable -- I'll take Harryhausen or Henson over most of the CGI attempts lately. Unfortunately, Hollywood seems to half-heartedly strive for greatness and realism with every movie, and more often than not it fails to achieve either. In my thirty years I've seen some terrible visual effects, some only terrible in retrospect, some only terrible in perspective with what else has been done. I'm not usually surprised by bad effects, though, because I've developed a cynicism about effects, particularly about CGI, that causes me to expect the worst. Nonetheless, I've picked seven movies that did actually surprise me -- a lot.</p>
<p><strong>1. <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0360717/">King Kong</a> </em>(2005)</strong></p>
<p>In <em>The Return of the King</em>, <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0001392/">Peter Jackson</a> has some bad effects shots, but at least they're just shots. In his next film, <em>King Kong</em>, he has bad effects <em>sequences</em>. And as with <em>The Return of the King</em>, they are all the more apparent and all the more frustrating because there are actually some great effects shots and sequences in <em>King Kong </em>(it did deserve the Oscar). The worst example in <em>Kong </em>is the dinosaur stampede. At first the sequence is tolerable because the dinos are rendered beautifully and the weak green-screen compositing is not any worse than what many of us grew up with. But as the sequence progresses, the interaction between the actors and the computer-generated dinos looks too fake, too much like something made long ago, before computers were even used. Both the part on the cliff and the part where the animals fall over each other are sloppy and unacceptable. It is a completely ironic sequence, too, since it begins with an exchange about movies looking real. At least someone thought to <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=I04E3zs6A0c">score the thing sped up with "Yakkety Sax"</a> or it wouldn't be completely useless. </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Seven: Movies That Surprised Me With Their Bad Special Effects</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/944867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/22/cinematical-seven-movies-that-surprised-me-with-their-bad-speci/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>fantastic four</category><category>FantasticFour</category><category>film</category><category>gothika</category><category>howard the duck</category><category>HowardTheDuck</category><category>hulk</category><category>king kong</category><category>KingKong</category><category>logan's run</category><category>Logan'sRun</category><category>movie</category><category>spawn</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Year of Fog' Heading to Hollywood</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/year-of-fog-heading-to-hollywood/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/year-of-fog-heading-to-hollywood/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/year-of-fog-heading-to-hollywood/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/07/yearoffog-small.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Newmarket Films has built a tasty reputation by producing and/or distributing such intelligent offerings as <em>The Prestige,</em> <em>God Grew Tired of Us</em> and <em>Death of a President.</em> Their latest endeavor is no less challenging: <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117967927.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">according to </a><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1183382021453*/">Variety,</a> </em>they have acquired the screen rights to <a href="http://www.michellerichmond.com/">Michelle Richmond's</a> novel <em>The Year of Fog</em>. Richmond's second book has garnered praise as a literary page-turner since its publication at the end of March. <br /><br />it relates the story of a photographer named Abby and her fianc&eacute; Jake. Abby takes Jake's six-year-old daughter to Ocean Beach in San Francisco one day, looks away momentarily to snap a picture, and when she looks back the little girl is gone. As a review in the <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/27/RVGGPPSA0R1.DTL&amp;type=books"><em>San Francisco Chronicle</em></a> reveals, "<span class="georgia md" id="bodytext">each reacts according to personal nature, abandoning any semblance of normalcy in the process. Jake's a teacher, a planner, and he throws himself into organizing a storefront volunteer group that keeps him frenetically busy. Abby, a loner, takes off on her own, spending long hours at the beach and in increasingly unsavory neighborhoods." As the search for the little girl continues, the toll upon both Abby and Jake mounts. The only real question mark that has been raised by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Year-Fog-Michelle-Richmond/dp/0385340117/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-7949849-3168648?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1183380200&amp;sr=1-1">readers at Amazon.com</a> is about the ending, but beware of possible spoilers if you venture forth.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_5708310"><em>Denver Post</em></a> </span><span id="redesign_default">review said: "A good part of what makes <em>The Year of Fog</em> compulsively readable is the voice of its narrator." That's the challenge that's been set before <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0155069/">Semi Chellas,</a> who has been hired to convert that narrative voice into cinematic terms. She's a veteran writer for Canadian television (<em>The Eleventh Hour, Dead Aviators</em>), though this appears to be her first adaptation of a novel. </span>Have any of you read the book? Would it make a good film? Or is this a story best left to the printed page?<span class="georgia md" id="bodytext"></span><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117967927.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/year-of-fog-heading-to-hollywood/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/931144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/year-of-fog-heading-to-hollywood/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>michelle richmond</category><category>movies</category><category>semi chellas</category><category>the year of fog</category><dc:creator>Peter Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Death of a President Dropped by Italian Theaters</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/13/death-of-a-president-dropped-by-italian-theaters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/13/death-of-a-president-dropped-by-italian-theaters/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/13/death-of-a-president-dropped-by-italian-theaters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/08/deathofapresident.jpg" alt="" />The controversial fake doc <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/"><em>Death of a President</em></a> came and went in America, where it earned only half a million bucks at the box office (it is still running every weekend at NYC's <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961057.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">Pioneer Theater</a>, if you're still interested), but it is still making its way around the globe. It will open this Friday in Italy, though on 30% fewer screens than originally planned. Lucky Red, which is distributing the film there claims that some exhibitors <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961057.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">have bailed</a> on their booking in order <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961057.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1"> to avoid trouble. In addition to the cancellations, Lucky Red is also dealing with the fact that its ads for the film, which features a tombstone with </a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_bush">President Bush's</a> name inscribed, are disappearing all over Rome. Apparently people are tearing the posters down either for a souvenir or to protest (I say the former is more likely). <br /><br />The main issue for exhibitors actually has little to do with protests regarding George Bush. In fact, the cancellations seem to be out of respect less for our current President than for their former prime minster, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldo_Moro">Aldo Moro</a>, who was assassinated in 1978. It turns out that Lucky Red accidentally and coincidentally scheduled the release of <em>DoaP</em> on the 29th anniversary of Moro's kidnapping by the terrorist group <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Brigades">The Red Brigades</a> (they killed him nearly two months later). Of course, exhibitors should have been looking for an excuse to get out of their bookings anyway since the movie is not very good and it hasn't been performing well in other markets. After <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15161123/">bans from theater chains</a> may have helped <em>DoaP</em> flop in America, it can be expected that the same will happen in Italy.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961057.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/13/death-of-a-president-dropped-by-italian-theaters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/851797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/13/death-of-a-president-dropped-by-italian-theaters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>aldo moro</category><category>AldoMoro</category><category>cinematical</category><category>death of a president</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><category>film</category><category>italian cinema</category><category>ItalianCinema</category><category>italy</category><category>movies</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Jim Caviezel Returns as Jesus</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/religious/" rel="tag">Religious</a></p><img height="150" alt="The image " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/06/passion.jpg" width="150" align="right" border="1" errors="" contains="" it="" because="" displayed="" be="" cannot="" />There aren't any plans for an official <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/12/07/mel-gibson-gets-on-his-high-horse-about-sequels/">sequel</a> to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/"><em>The Passion of the Christ</em></a> (unofficial is <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/06/08/passion-of-the-christ-ii-sort-of/">another story</a>), but one Bible publisher is producing what seems to be a related product. This October, Nelson Bibles <a href="http://www.pr-inside.com/caviezel-to-reprise-role-as-jesus-r40895.htm">will release</a> a 25-hour audiobook of the New King James Version complete with a star-studded cast, including <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001029/">Jim Caviezel</a> as the voice of Jesus. <br /><br />The rest of the <em>Passion</em> cast has been substituted with other big names, and there doesn't seem to be any affiliation with Newmarket Films or <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000154/">Mel Gibson</a>, but obviously Nelson is using the connection to its advantage. Otherwise the real appeal of the audiobook, entitled <em>The Word of Promise: New Testament</em>, should be <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000654/">Terrence Stamp</a>, who provides the voice of God, and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000377/">Richard Dreyfuss</a>, who plays Moses. <br /><br />There will be a follow-up (or, should I say prequel?) to the audiobook that will be based on the Old Testament, and Stamp and Dreyfuss will return in their respective parts. Unfortunately, Caviezel's role will not be included. Neither will the parts played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000673/">Marisa Tomei</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001617/">Lou Diamond Phillips</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931090/">Kimberly Williams</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001368/">Ernie Hudson</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001334/">John Heard</a> or <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000580/">Luke Perry</a> (try to imagine Judas with Dylan McKay's sideburns).<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jim Caviezel Returns as Jesus</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/737224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/16/jim-caviezel-returns-as-jesus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bible</category><category>jim caviezel</category><category>JimCaviezel</category><category>mel gibson</category><category>MelGibson</category><category>moses</category><category>new testament</category><category>NewTestament</category><category>old testament</category><category>OldTestament</category><category>richard dreyfuss</category><category>RichardDreyfuss</category><category>terrence stamp</category><category>TerrenceStamp</category><category>the passion of the christ</category><category>ThePassionOfTheChrist</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Death of a President Dead at Box Office</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/08/deathofapresident.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="" />Controversy doesn't always sell, and Newmarket Films found this out the hard way over the weekend with its dismal receipts from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/"><em>Death of a President</em></a>. The faux doc grossed only $282,000 from the 143 theaters it played at in the U.S. and Canada, and its per-screen average was only $1,970. Compare that with the much better <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/review-shut-up-and-sing/"><em>Shut Up &amp; Sing</em></a>, which also opened over the weekend with appeal to the Bush-hating crowd; it played in only four theaters for a per-screen average of $12,525. Plus, if we look at <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/indexes/2006/10/30/movies/boxoffice/weekend_ny/index.html">NYC's box office</a>, which is a better gauge for small films like <em>DoaP </em>and <em>SU&amp;S</em>, the latter made $21,159 (in two theaters), while the former made less than half that, at $9,043 (in three theaters). <br /><br />Considering the $1 million that Newmarket reportedly paid for the film, the take is very disappointing. Still, there is a good chance that even moviegoers turned off from the subject matter will be more curious in the privacy of their own homes, and the distributor should make its money back through DVD and TV sales. But the numbers should show that such awareness does not always mean anticipation. The same was true last summer with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/21/box-office-report-snakes-win-but-its-not-enough/">the opening gross</a> for <em><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/18/review-snakes-on-a-plane-scotts-take/">Snakes on a Plane</a> </em>(coincidentally,  <em>DoaP </em>rhymes with <em>SoaP</em>). <br /><br />More on <em>Death of a President</em>:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/">Netscape Video: <em>Death of a President</em></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-review-death-of-a-president-d-o-a-p/">TIFF Review: <em>Death of a President</em></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/"><em>Death of a President</em>: There's No Publicity Like No Publicity</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/31/death-of-a-president-in-the-u-s/"><em>Death of a President</em> -- in the U.S.?</a><br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061031/film_nm/leisure_president_dc>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/693519/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/31/death-of-a-president-dead-at-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>death of a president</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Netscape Video: Death of a President</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/" rel="tag">Toronto International Film Festival</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://movies.netscape.com/embed/320/QXUXDSJJYHXZRIYPFFCW"></script><br /><br />Netscape's Karina Longworth sat down with <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/">Death of a President</a></em> director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1235949/">Gabriel Range</a>, and has intertwined the interview with her own thoughts and criticisms of the faux documentary and the controversial buzz surrounding it. The most important point addressed in the video is probably the fact that the film is actually the opposite of anti-Bush. Karina even goes so far as to say it is, "definitely sympathetic," in its treatment of the president and, "it manages to truly humanize him," turning him into a "misunderstood hero."<br /><br />You can watch the video right here, or <a href="http://movies.netscape.com/story/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/">go to Netscape and download it</a>.<br /><br />More on <em>DOAP</em>:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/">Cinematical Buzz Reviews: <em>Death of a President</em></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/"><em>Death of a President</em>: There's No Publicity Like No Publicity</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/26/canadians-want-you-to-see-death-of-a-president/">Canadians Want You to See <em>Death of a President</em></a><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/691981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/netscape-video-death-of-a-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>death of a president</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><category>film</category><category>gabriel range</category><category>GabrielRange</category><category>george bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>karina longworth</category><category>KarinaLongworth</category><category>movies</category><category>netscape</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Buzz Reviews: Death of a President</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mystery-and-suspense/" rel="tag">Mystery &amp; Suspense</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/theatrical-reviews/" rel="tag">Theatrical Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/" rel="tag">Toronto International Film Festival</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" id="vimage_1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/09/doap.jpg" /><br /><br />(<em>The following review ran during Cinematical's coverage of <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/">The Toronto International Film Festival</a>; with </em>Death of a Presiden<em>t bowing today in limited release, we're glad to share it with you again.)</em><br />
<p class="MsoPlainText">Occasionally, on the festival circuit, there's a movie that garners significant press before it even opens, and mainstream press at that.<span> </span>The controversy could be political, artistic or any one of a number of things. This year at <city w:st="on"></city>Toronto, the as-yet-unseen-but-buzzed-about buzz flick was <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/">Death of a President</a> </em>-- a British mockumentary promising a look at a hypothetical 2007 assassination of George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States. Coyly listed in the program guides as <a href="http://www.e.bell.ca/filmfest/2006/films_schedules/films_description.asp?id=88"><em>D.O.A.P</em></a>., the film's mere existence and outline caused a controversy, and incited strong feelings from both the <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/">Right-wing blogosphere</a> and <a href="http://www.irishexaminer.com/breaking/story.asp?j=83482162&amp;p=8348z464&amp;n=83482542&amp;x=">Kevin Costner</a> (raising the question of which of those is actually less relevant). Political filmmaking about what-ifs is nothing new, nor are mock-docs about politically charged realities. <em>C.S.A: The Confederate States of </em>and <em>It Happened Here</em> both come to mind, as well as much of the work of Peter Watkins. <em>Death of a President</em>, it seemed, might be the newest entry into the field. Or public outrage over its essential plot might make the film disappear, a casualty of a just-declared War on Premises. ...</p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Buzz Reviews: Death of a President</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/691612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/27/cinematical-buzz-reviews-death-of-a-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>CSI</category><category>Death of a president</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><category>Mockumentary</category><category>rabblerousing</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Death of a President: There's No Publicity Like No Publicity</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/" rel="tag">Toronto International Film Festival</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/10/doappub.jpg" id="vimage_1" />Movie marketing's a bit of a chess game for a lower-budget indie -- you want to always make tactical choices between advertising (which you pay for) and publicity (which you don't). For a great demonstration of this phenomenon, <a href="http://www.moviecitynews.com/Notepad/2006/061023_pr.html">check out this press release</a> from Newmarket films who picked up shock mock doc <em>Death of a President</em> at Toronto about how they are shocked, shocked that NPR and CNN won't run ads for the film.<br /><br />Of course, this is the best of both worlds, as the Movie City News point out in their pithy headline -- now Newmarket doesn't have to pay money it probably doesn't have to run ads it can't afford ... and they'll benefit from some nice, juicy controversy. I think my favorite weasel-words in the press release come courtesy of Newmarket co-founder Chris Ball: "As everyone who has actually seen the movie agrees, <em>Death of a President</em> is the opposite of a call for violence - it's a powerfully cautionary tale about the pernicious effects of violence. ..." Take this the right way, Mr. Ball, but I don't think that a cautionary subtext about the pernicious effects of violence is what people go see <em>DOAP</em> for, anymore than they're watching porn for the safe sex message when the condoms come out. And also, let's not forget there's a fine distinction between censorship (which, to me, has always meant the government actively banning something) and the legitimate decision of a business to not accept an advertisement. Are NPR and CNN within their rights, in your eyes ... and will you go see <em>Death of a President </em>when it opens? <br /><br />(<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-review-death-of-a-president-d-o-a-p/">Click here</a> for Cinematical's Toronto Film Festival review of <em>Death of a President</em>.)<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.moviecitynews.com/>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/690149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/10/24/death-of-a-president-theres-no-publicity-like-no-publicity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>CNN</category><category>Death of a President</category><category>DeathOfAPresident</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>NPR</category><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>TIFF Update: Deals for President and Nation</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-update-deals-for-president-and-nation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-update-deals-for-president-and-nation/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-update-deals-for-president-and-nation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/ifc/" rel="tag">IFC</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/toronto-international-film-festival/" rel="tag">Toronto International Film Festival</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="150" alt="So Goes the Nation" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/09/sq_tiff_nation.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Two more films that premiered in Toronto this week have acquired U.S. distribution: <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0432337/"><em>...So Goes the Nation</em></a> and, perhaps surprisingly, <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0853096/"><em>Death of a President</em></a>. IFC bought the North American distribution rights to <em>...So Goes the Nation</em>, a documentary about the American electoral process with a focus on Ohio during the 2004 Presidential campaign. IFC hopes to release the film before U.S. midterm elections this fall through its First Take arm, which simultaneously releases movies in theaters and on cable-on-demand channels.<br /><br />Newmarket took a chance and grabbed the U.S. distribution rights to <em>Death of a President</em> (aka <em>DOAP</em>), one of the more controversial films screening at TIFF this year. The mock-documentary narrative portrays a future in which President George W. Bush is assassinated, and manipulates live-action footage to make the fictional events look plausible. It <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/08/31/death-of-a-president-in-the-u-s/">seemed highly doubtful</a> that any U.S. distributor would be interested in the film, which was produced by Channel 4 in the UK. Newmarket is probably used to controversy, having distributed <em>The Passion of the Christ</em>. I'll be interested to see what kind of release the film will have, and how amenable theaters will be about showing the film.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/film_nm/leisure_filmfest_president_dc>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-update-deals-for-president-and-nation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/667538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/09/12/tiff-update-deals-for-president-and-nation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>IFC First Take</category><category>movie</category><category>politics</category><category>TIFF</category><category>toronto international film festival</category><dc:creator>Jette Kernion</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Distribution Deal for Sundance Winner</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/14/distribution-deal-for-sundance-winner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/14/distribution-deal-for-sundance-winner/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/14/distribution-deal-for-sundance-winner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sundance/" rel="tag">Sundance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="151" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/05/godgrew.jpg" />Yet another 2006 Sundance success story has scored US distribution. This time, it's <em><a name="director2000" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0301555/">God Grew Tired of Us</a></em>, the debut of director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1077724/">Christopher Dillon Quinn</a>, which won both an audience award and the jury prize for best documentary at the festival, and has been picked up by Newmarket. The movie, which tells the story of three Sudanese refugees adjusting to their new lives in the US, has been well-reviewed at festival screenings -- though it's also sometimes criticized for treading the same path as 2003's impressive doc, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383475/">The Lost Boys of Sudan</a></em>, a film from which it gets its subtitle -- but outside of festivals it hasn't really been seen. Thanks to Newmarket, though, that's going to change: The distributor plans to have the film in American theaters this fall.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117943023?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/14/distribution-deal-for-sundance-winner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/617654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/14/distribution-deal-for-sundance-winner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>God Grew Tired of Us</category><category>movie</category><category>Newmarket</category><category>Sundance</category><dc:creator>Martha Fischer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 20:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Review: The Chumscrubber</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sundance/" rel="tag">Sundance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/theatrical-reviews/" rel="tag">Theatrical Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><p><img align="middle" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/08/chumscrubber.jpg" alt="The Chumscrubber"/></p>
<p>Okay, now I'm convinced that many of the critics whose reviews count over at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/?">Rotten Tomatoes</a> are secretly Pod People. That's the only way I can think of to explain how <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0406650/">The Chumscrubber</a></em> has a 32% rating over there, while <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0412019/">Broken Flowers</a></em> has an 87%.&nbsp; I saw both of these movies, and I'll tell you right now, one of them? Not nearly as great as its been touted to be. And the other? Much, much better than a lot of critics are giving it credit for.</p>
<p><em>The Chumscrubber</em> is not your typical teen&nbsp;film. It tackles complex social issues without being condescending; it somehow manages to walk the line between drama and&nbsp;dark satiric comedy&nbsp;without being trite, cutesy, or quirky for the sake of quirkiness (an annoying trend which I'm seeing more and more with indie films lately). </p>
<p>This was a fabulously layered movie about the isolating loneliness of a self-medicated society, a world where everyone walks around in a solipsitic bubble, lightly bumping into each other rather than really interacting. On the surface, <em>The Chumscrubber </em>might appear to be just your average indie satire of suburban society, but there is much more to this movie than that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Review: The Chumscrubber</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/08/11/review-the-chumscrubber/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Allison+Janney</category><category>AllisonJanney</category><category>Glenn+Close</category><category>GlennClose</category><category>Jaime+Bell</category><category>JaimeBell</category><category>Ralph+Fiennes</category><category>RalphFiennes</category><category>Rita+Wilson</category><category>RitaWilson</category><category>The+Chumscrubber</category><category>TheChumscrubber</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:01:44 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Berney &amp; Co Settle on Picturehouse</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/berney-and-co-settle-on-picturehouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/berney-and-co-settle-on-picturehouse/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/berney-and-co-settle-on-picturehouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/05/color10.jpg" alt="color10.jpg"/>The big <a href="http://www.moviecitynews.com/Notepad/2005/050513_pr.html">Bob Berney-led HBO/New Line venture</a> has found itself a name, and that name is Picturehouse. A statement issued today, uh, stated: "The 
          goal for Picturehouse is to be the theatrical distribution company of 
          choice for a wide-ranging community of independent filmmakers, and to 
          deliver a consistently high-quality slate of pictures to audiences." Picturehouse, which plans to relaese 8-10 films a year, is already compiling a compelling slate, including <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/cannes-2005-van-sants-last-days/">Gus Van
Sant</a>'s <em>Last Days</em>, the Diane Arbus biopic <em>Fur</em>, the "real-life <em>School of Rock</em>" doc <em>Rock School</em>, <em>The Chumscrubber</em>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0366004/">Mary Harron</a>'s <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001543/">Gretchen Mol</a>-starring Bettie Page biopic, Tribeca/SXSW <strike>also-ran</strike> "crowd-pleaser" <em>The Thing About My Folks</em>, and Kenneth Branagh's latest experiment in Shakespearean revival, <em>As You Like It</em>. <br/><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.moviecitynews.com/Notepad/2005/050513_pr.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/berney-and-co-settle-on-picturehouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/8782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/13/berney-and-co-settle-on-picturehouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 16:01:22 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Dredging the wires: Can we have the mask back now, Hayden?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/09/dredging-the-wires-vader-reeve-nichols-cobain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/09/dredging-the-wires-vader-reeve-nichols-cobain/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/09/dredging-the-wires-vader-reeve-nichols-cobain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a></p><ul><li><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Darth Vader" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/05/darth_vader.jpg"/>As we <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/">previously reported</a>, HBO Films and New Line Cinema acquired Newmarket Films in an effort to bring smaller titles to the big screen. One of the first films to get the <a href="http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/news/wire/sns-ap-tv-hbo-films,0,1956231.story?page=1&amp;coll=sns-ap-entertainment-headlines">full HBO treatment</a> will be <strong>Gus Van Sant</strong>'s<em> Last Days</em>, which dramatizes the descent and eventual suicide of <strong>Kurt</strong> <strong>Cobain</strong>. Will it peeve HBO subscribers that their "original content" is no longer "original?" Probably.</li><li><strong>Hayden</strong> <strong>Christensen</strong> loves the costume. In an <a href="http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/news/wire/sns-ap-film-hayden-christensen,0,4201776.story?page=1&amp;coll=sns-ap-entertainment-headlines">interview with AP</a>, Christensen talks about the empowering, near-religious experience of wearing The Mask. "I almost got this sort of beastly sense when I was in it." But will he take it off?</li><li>Stony Brook awards an <a href="http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/news/wire/sns-ap-christopher-reeve,0,827236.story?coll=sns-ap-entertainment-headlines">honorary degree</a> to Superman aka <strong>Christopher</strong> <strong>Reeve</strong>, who died in 2004. Reeve will now be a post-humous Doctor of "humane letters." No word on if that position is tenured.</li><li>That "nice little movie" <strong>Mike Nichols</strong> made back in 1967? <em>The</em> <em>Graduate</em> <a href="http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/news/wire/sns-ap-people-mike-nichols,0,4368445.story?coll=sns-ap-entertainment-headlines">screened</a> last Friday at the Motion Picture Academy Theatre. Despite the well-worn soundtrack and that "short, plain-looking actor" in the role of Benjamin Braddock, everyone "reacted warmly."</li></ul>
<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/09/dredging-the-wires-vader-reeve-nichols-cobain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/8436/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/05/09/dredging-the-wires-vader-reeve-nichols-cobain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kat Parr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 19:40:48 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>DVD Review: The Woodsman</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/dvd-reviews/" rel="tag">DVD Reviews</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/04/The Woodsman poster.jpg" alt="Kevin Bacon in The Woodsman"/>I figured if I was already depressed from watching the latest Presidential press conference, I might as well make a night of it. <em>The Woodsman</em> arrived on the DVD shelves earlier this month, and I admit, as an entertainment writer I should be a little more on top of these things. But honestly, I wasn't sure I wanted to see a film about a child molester re-integrating into society.<br/><br/>Turns out I didn't have much to be afraid of-and not just because of
content.<br/><br/><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DVD Review: The Woodsman</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/7663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/04/29/dvd-review-the-woodsman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Kat Parr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:15:30 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>BREAKING: New Line Absorbs Newmarket, Berney Stays In The Lead</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fine-line/" rel="tag">Fine Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="bob-berney.jpg" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/03/bob-berney3.jpg"/>New Line Cinema and HBO Films are about to strike a deal to acquire Newmarket Films, which they plan to absorb into indie division Fine Line. Newmarket president <strong>Bob Berney</strong> is expected to stay on board to lead the combined entity, which has yet to be renamed. The future of Fine Line's current staff is, at this point, unclear. Berney has had phenomenal success (at Newmarket, and first at IFC Films) distributing difficult-to-market pictures - <em>My Big Fat Greek Wedding</em>, <em>Monster</em>, <em>The Passion of the Christ</em> - that no one else knew what to do with.&nbsp; Fine Line, meanwhile, has been making a lot of critically acclaimed films of late - <em>The Sea Inside</em>, <em>Vera Drake - </em>but these pics have struggled at the box office. One imagines that Berney's presence is, thus, the key to the sale. More on this story as it develops.&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:10:09 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Passion of the Christ Fuels Hate Crime?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/16/passion-of-the-christ-fuels-hate-crime/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/16/passion-of-the-christ-fuels-hate-crime/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/16/passion-of-the-christ-fuels-hate-crime/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a></p><img width="200" height="177" align="left" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/03/passion1.jpg" alt="passion1.jpg"/>&nbsp;A report by The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith has concluded that <strong>Mel Gibson</strong>'s <em>The Passion of the Christ </em>is in part responsible for a huge surge in anti-Semitic crimes in Canada. B'nai Brith found evidence of 32 such crimes in 2004, nine of which occured in February, the month <em>Passion</em> opened. This is up from a grand total of nine incidents throughout the entire previous year. Vice President of the League <strong>Frank Dimant</strong> released a statement highlighting the causal relationship between the film and various attacks, relating incidents such as one in which the perpetrator called a Jewish organization to say, "We don't need Mel Gibson's film to hate you!" <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=filmNews&amp;storyID=2005-03-16T072105Z_01_N16674314_RTRIDST_0_FILM-FILM-PASSION-DC.XML">Reuters</a> has the full story.<br/><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/16/passion-of-the-christ-fuels-hate-crime/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/929/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/16/passion-of-the-christ-fuels-hate-crime/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:54:50 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>